John Stuart Mills and David Miller-"Mills' work"

Second, the capacity of the Canadian people, both the broadcasters and the consumers, to develop their own thinking and determine their own choices is undermined by the regime's self-righteous belief that it is infallibly correct (Mills 21, 32).

However, from Miller's point of view, subject field acculturation must be protected even if it means the invasion of private liberty because every individual derives an integral image of their identity from their national identity (85-6). Because of the increase in population, individuals bank increasely on the mass media to promote characteristics of the national agriculture (Miller 32). According to Miller, the reliance on the mechanism of the market is pitiful in ensuring their existence (87). The fact that American producers ar subject to sell their programs overseas for much less than their cost of products places them at an economically advantageous situation vis-a-vis Canadian producers. Without government restrictions, the Canadian broadcasters will be more likely to acquire "cheap imported" programs in order to increase their competitiveness, albeit at the expense of quality programming and the national culture.

Based on the discussion of these two opposing viewpoints, it is evident that the Canadian break of content restrictions raises an interesting questi

Furthermore, one's national identity overly serves as a significant trace in bringing disparate individuals together when their nation confronts an away aggressor that threatens the existence of their nationhood. Essentially, an individual's loyalty to their nation contributes to the nation's capacity to tolerate security for its people to pursue their life (Miller 165).

However, this objection does non take into account the lack of balance in the contention between American producers and Canadian producers. Clearly, they are not competing on a level playing field when American producers are selling programs at a price that is below the costs of production because they are able to spread the costs among their advertisers.

In this situation, the Canadian government's intervention enables Canadian producers to have an opportunity to attest the quality of their products to Canadian broadcasters. Otherwise, the individuality and freedom of Canadian producers would be undermined by the dynamics of the global market that serves not as a liberating force, but as an oppressive institution that advances the interests of the voluminous at the expense of others who do not possess the selfsame(prenominal) resources.

Beyond the issue of restricting television program contents, the liberalists' main objection to the protection of national culture is the republic's imposition of actor over individual liberties. Essentially, the government's advocacy of national culture should not be imposed on every individual. Mills' description of the state is still a complaint used by liberalists who conceptualize that state intervention in television programming represents "an increasing inclination to stretch unduly the powers of society over the individual both by force of opinion and even by that of legislation" (13). In this case, the Canadian broadcasters should be allowed to decide for themselves the comely course of action. At the same time, Canadian consumers of television programs should also be
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!