Differences between Durkheim and Marx theory

Further, both Marx and Durkheim take a holistic as opposed to an individualistic view of society. point while they do agree to view society from a holistic approach, they contrast in that Marx viewed society as a compete between groups, "The key to history, Marx believed, is class conflict-the bitter struggle between those who own the manner of producing wealth and those who do not" (Robertson 1987: 14). In contrast, Durkheim felt up society consisted of dividing labor between groups for the progression of common ends. Durkheim's functionalism stands in contrast to Marx's materialism. Durkheim emphasized the problematic personality of hearty order in his writings; "He argued that societies are held together by the shared beliefs and values of their members, especially as these are expressed in religious doctrine and rite" (Robertson 1987: 15).

Marx viewed the social conflict inherent in class struggle as making vicissitude inevitable. Marx argued that such a class conflict could only end with the total dismantling of the thought (i.e., exploiting) class and the formation of a classless and free society. perhaps Marx' most significant contribution to sociology is his dialectical materialism. Within this fancy Marx argues that virtually no aspect or characteristics is untouched by economics. This includes religion, government, education, lam, and gender. As Robertson (1987: 15) notes: "Marx placed special empha

Giddens, A. Capitalism and Modern Social Theory. New York: Cambridge, 1971.

Marx felt that the dismantle classes were basically imprisoned in the iron triangle of capitalism because they could never earn above a subsistence income nor own the nub of production short of revolution. The ruling classes need to continue to green goods to maintain and enhance their wealth at the expense of the opposite classes. This is why women and minorities have traditionally been given little index by the ruling classes, while if being employed were traditionally low-paid labor or even enslaved labor. Work is one social institution that pay backd notions of gender and race as small to the main gender (male) and race (white) of the powerful ruling class.

culture is another and females and minority races have traditionally experienced disagreement when it comes to access to education. As Marx wrote about what he saw as a class system inevitably leading to revolution by the "entrapped" masses:

When it comes to class stratification and race and gender, Marx felt that the economic base influenced our psychological constructs of these aspects of society. Marx placed great sizeableness on the economic base as a means of influencing the character of all other cultural aspects. When it comes to law, government, education, or perceptions and definitions of race and gender, Marx argued that social institutions (government, schools, the workplace, etc) reinforce them. However, because of economic inequality and class stratification, they reinforce the perceptions and definitions of aspects of culture such as race and gender held by those who control the economic power base in society, not those who do not. This biased and one-sided power equation is why Marx felt revolution was inevitable. As Robertson (1987: 261) notes, "Any attempt to drive out the ruling class is likely to be regarded as a revolutionary assault on the state as a whole, because the interests of the two are so closel
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!