Eye witness testimony is evidence of what a witness believes to have occurred and although eye witness testimonies aid in making a conviction creditable they are a good deal backed up by a lot of living evidence as an eye witness testimony can be harmful to a conviction as memories change. The ontogeny length of time, the emotion experienced before and later on the resultant role and the pace of which the event happened can alter the memories drastically, there is alike the chance that memories can be alter by terzetto take leaveies, enhanced features and false claims; the list above are hardly some reason for why our court system doesnt base conviction on eye witness claims and label to find as much supporting evidence as possible to from a creditable conviction.
One of the first placeable flaws in the case of James Taylor is that his conviction was based on eye witness testimonies that throughout the case had been inconsistent and modify after the witnesses were shown a photo of James Taylor several months after the crime had occurred and given information about his past as yet the witnesses remained unsure and were left with the possibility that it couldve been him. After that interview the witnesses took part in a line up resulting in all the witnesses recalling the same man. It is possible that by a third party introducing a new element to the witnesses there memories could have been altered by the information given, the photo shown or the way in which the police interviewed them. The outcome could have been...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment