customary health-care reportage, according to the presidents plan, would be largely control by enrollment in open programs, such as Medicaid and SCHIP, in which the government sets benefit levels and provider reimbursement rate. Being nominally covered in a public health policy program is of little value if prohibitively low reimbursement rates and administrative hassles prevent physicians from accepting you as a patient.
present in on the Debate!
Sound off! luck your opinions close the pros and cons of Obamas health-care plan in the comments section below.
Although the patient is the central figure and the key decision maker in the health-care system, the presidents plan unfortunately appears to continue the paternalistic view that government, not the individual patient, should decide the value of health-care services. respective(prenominal) patients, regardless of income level, are capable of making appropriate decisions about their own health care, given the proper incentives.
Giving patients ownership of their health-care resources and choice over how those resources will be spent will also increase the demand for transparency about the live and quality of services.
Rather than attempting to control the behavior of payers and providers through mandates and set controls, the president should realign incentives by giving patients the financial rear they need and allowing them to choose from a variety of insurance coverage options, according to their needs. This is the same system available to President Obama and all other federal employees.
Ultimately, the goal of real reform should be for the government to stop trying to design and operate public health-insurance plans and instead...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment