Chronicle of a Death Foretold and the Stranger Essay

Conflict Resulting From the Negative make of Rigid Societal Expectations in A floor of A expiration Foretold by Gabriel Garcia Marquez and The Stranger by Albert Camus Everyone has felt the pressure of societal expectations during their lifetime. The veto effects purchase order brings on ones life flock lead to a feeling of rejection towards the population who do non correct to meet those standards.Gabriel Garcia Marquez, author of Chronicle of a Death Foretold, and Albert Camus, author of The Stranger, two construct the orthogonal moral struggle of society versus the protagonist in order to critique the right smart society fails to accept the moral determine of the stack who discord from the norm. In Chronicle of a Death Foretold, Gabriel Garcia Marquez emphasizes the profound conflict of society versus the protagonist, based on beliefs and determine, through the controversy stellar(a) up to the murder of capital of Chile Nasar, which is based on family honor and pre-marital excite.When Pedro and Pablo Vicario implore their sister, Angela Vicario, who had stolen her virginity, her response is described as She only took the time necessary to opine the name and she nailed it to the wall with her well-aimed dart, like a butterfly with no entrust whose sentence has already been write. capital of Chile Nasar, she verbalise(47). Describing Angelas response as only took the time necessary indicates that she is trying to put the blame on Santiago, making him a scapegoat, in order to entertain the true hu valet de chambre beings who took her virginity before marriage.In the Latin American society, where the setting of the novelette takes place, it is non acceptable for a woman to have pre-marital sex due to the beliefs and ethics of Catholics. Santiago is represented as the butterfly whose sentence had already been written. Even though there is no evidence Santiago took Angelas virginity, it is the twins duty to protect their sister. Ther efore, Pedro and Pablo Vicario set aside to slay the man who had stolen their sisters virginity, Santiago Nasar, in order to protect their family.The twin tell everyone in town about their plan to murder Santiago, but the spate in the community doubt their intentions twenty-two people declared they had heard everything said, and they all coincided in the impression that the only solid ground the brothers had said it was so that someone would come over to hear them(51). The people in the town who coincide in the impression that the only reason the brothers had said it was so that someone would come over to hear them signals how oblivious the township act owards a societal members life.Society looks ultimo at the fact that a murder is about to occur, but focuses on the direct family honor, which is highly respected. Since it is unacceptable for a female to have sex before marriage, Santiago is viewed in a negative light by society because he is accused of taking the virginity of an unmarried woman. The debate meet Santiagos death highlights the conflict between society and the protagonist, where Santiago is a man who is accused of committing an act that society does not accept.Albert Camus, in The Stranger, constructs the protagonist, Monsieur Meursault, as a man who has absurdist morals and values, which society does not accept. Meursault has an inner relationship with Marie Cardona, a former typist, but the connection does not go beyond a physical attraction she wanted to know if I drive ind her. I answered the same way I had the last time, that it didnt mean anything but that I probably didnt love her (41).By Meursault stating it didnt mean anything and I probably didnt love her highlights his absurdist views on life he believes life contains no purpose, thus he cannot love Marie because loving Marie would give life a purpose, which Meursault does not believe. He apparently associates with Marie, because he likes being around her. There is no que st for an randy connection because the physical appearance of her is satisfying enough. Absurdism is not authoritative in society therefore it does not accept Meursault.He is an outsider in a world he did not choose. Meursault is a man who does not show his emotions very well, but instead focuses on his physical need I explained to him, however, that my nature was such that my physical needs often got in the way of my feelings (65). Meursault saying that my physical needs often got in the way of my feelings emphasizes the simplistic life he livea life without meaning. presentation emotions would signify a life with purpose, which Meursault does not believe.The Algerian society, in which the novella takes place, does not accept the type of lifestyle Meursault lives and believes every life should be lived with a purpose. Societys expectations clash with Meursaults values because his beliefs and outlooks on life are not accepted by society, which sets up the foreign conflict betwee n the two. In the external conflict between society and the protagonist, Garcia Marquez emphasizes the negative effects society has on a person who goes once morest the neighborly norm by showing the biased opinions towards the Pedro and Pablo Vicario regarding Santiagos murder. afterwards brutally stabbing Santiago to death, the Vicario twins sprint to the church to affirm the priest of their barbaric act Both were exhausted from the barbarous organise of death, and their clothes and arms were soaked and their faces smeared with sweat and still living origination but the priest recalled the surrender as an act of great high-handedness(49). The priest calling the murder an act of great dignity shows how, in the Latin American society, family honor is highly valued, no matter how outlying(prenominal) it is taken. Even though the twins have committed the worst criminal offence imaginable, it is acceptable because it was done in order to protect their family.Pedro and Pablo Vica rio are viewed as meeting expectations, as opposed to Santiago, who fails to follow them. When the crime was brought to judicatory, the twins had already won before it even started The attorney stood by the thesis of the homicide in legitimate defense of honor, which was upheld by the court in good faith, and the twins declared at the end of the trial that they would have done it again a thousand times over for the same reason (48). The lawyer stating the homicide as a legitimate defense of honor verifies that society values family honor over a mans life.The court solecism represents the conflict of society against Santiago and since he goes against societys values, Santiago ends up dying, indicating societys victory. The twins do not start any severe punishment, because of their intentions to protect their family. Through Santiagos death, Garcia Marquez stresses the detrimental effects society can have on someone whose beliefs differ from societal standards. Camus constructs M eursaults trial to critique societys deficiency of acceptance towards the people who do not meet expectations.Throughout the court case, Meursault is quickly judged by the prosecuting officer due to his actions concerning his get downs death, He said the truth was that I didnt have a someone and that nothing human, not one of my moral principles that governs mens hearts, was inwardly my reach (101). The prosecutor bluntly stating that Meursault didnt have a instinct and is incapable of having moral principles that governs mens hearts highlights how society does not understand Meursaults morals and values, thus critiques his character and neglects him. Meursault is looked down upon because of how he acted on the day of Mamans funeral.He does not express feelings towards his mothers death because he is an absurdist and believes death is inevitable. Society believes that there is purpose to every societal members life, and since Meursault plowshares absurdist views, he is not ac cepted by society. To close his final argument against Meursault, the prosecutor states, I ask you for this mans headnever as strongly as today have I felt this painful duty do easier, light, clearer by the certain knowledge of a sacred imperative and by the horror I feel when I look into a mans face and all I see is a heavyweight. (102). The unit of measurement trial is based around Meursaults character, and him being called a monster stresses the fact that society is unwilling to accept anyone who does not follow the expectations. Meursault does not share the same views that society wants, and as a result, he is jilted because of his moral values. By asking for this mans head the prosecutor shows how society neglects the people who share different views and therefore want them out of society completely.Camus uses the trial and Meursaults crime to emphasize the external conflict of society versus the protagonist, Meursault, to demonstrate how society does not accept people w ho share different moral values. The negative effects society has on the people who do not meet expectations are emphasized through the external conflict, based of moral values, between the protagonist and society in the Chronicle of a Death Foretold by Gabriel Garcia Marquez and The Stranger by Albert Camus. Both novellas show the harmful consequence faced by the protagonist, who do not adapt to societal expectations, which evidently resulted in death.