Ecological Systems Theory Essay

As I was growing up, I al focuss heard of the expression that slew argon a yield of their milieu. I never gave this expression a dandy deal thought until I got older and became more awargon of my surroundings and my own milieu. Personally, I impression that there is some integrity to this statement. A psyches milieu is rattling potent to their victimization. A noneworthy psychologist that studied youngster schooling, Dr. Urie Bronfenbrenner, developed the bionomic corpses opening to show how a peasants culture drive out be mildewd by their environs. Dr. Bronfenbrenner felt that a persons development is the product of a constellation of forces-cultural, social, economic, political- and non merely psychological ones (Fox, 2005, para 6). According to an article by Nancy Darling of Oberlin College, bionomical Systems Theory is presented as a theory of human development in which everything is seen as interrelated and our acquaintance of development is bounde d by context, culture, and muniment (Darling, 2007, p. 204).The ecologic Systems Theory constitutes of flipper aims of the surroundings that atomic number 18 influential to a peasants development. These five levels are the microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem, and the chronosystem. These five levels each contribute significantly and succors to regularise an individual which can allude their personality, the way they think, and who they are as a person overall.The first level, the microsystem, consists of the immediate environment that the nestling is in on a insouciant basis (Oswalt, 2008). The microsystem would include a youngsters immediate family, teachers, neighbors, daycare, school, and peers or anyone who a squirt or individual acts with this instant on a perfunctory basis. The microsystem is measurable to a peasants development because if the environment they are around on a daily basis is stable, nurturing, and caring, and so that pincer will plausibly imitate the kindred demeanour. However, if the nipper is in an environment where they are neglected and abused or see violence, this can lease an lure on their style and cause them to die affected by this veto environment.For example, if a child is surrounded by a family who is violent and does not pay very much attention to their needs, neighbors that use profanity, and aggressive peers, so this child is overt to more negative than verificatory behaviors. This can cause the child to model what they are exposed to, which is negativity. However, if the same child is in an environment where the family is nurturing, the teachers are welcoming and sanction eruditeness, and its peers display plusly charged degree social skills, then the child is exposed to positive behavior and is more likely to display positive behavior than negative. This level is closest to the child and is the most influential level of the ecological system (Paquette & Ryan, 2001).The following(a) level of the ecological systems theory is the mesosystem. The mesosystem consists of how the lot in the childs microsystem interact with each other. The mesosystem is the connection, or the consanguinity, between the parents and the teachers or the child and their peers, to name a few. For example, if the childs parents have a strong relationship with his or her teacher and are entangled with their education, this can help encourage learning and promote good behavior and good grades at school. If the parents are not involved at school and do not interact with the childs teacher regularly, the child may feel as if education is not essential and may display poor behavior and grades at school, which affects their learning.The ecological systems theory also includes the exosystem. The exosystem consists of lot that the child may not interact with on a daily basis but still has an square off on that child such as their neighbors, a coach, a preacher. The exosystem c ould also consist of situations that may happen to the parents that indirectly affects the child such as promotions or layoffs at work. A promotion or layoff at work determines how the child will be taken care of and impacts their physical needs (Oswalt, 2008). This type of situation can be either negative or positive for the child. A preacher or a coach can be looked upon as a role model or mentor to the child and can be very influential to a child and their development.The last two levels of the ecological systems theory are the macrosystem and the chronosystem. The macrosystem consists of cultures, values, and laws. The macrosystem describes the culture in which individuals pass (Santrock, 2007). The macrosystem has much to do with what is going on in society and how it affects the child. For example, a recession, a war, how society views gender roles, and the childs family values, can all greatly affect the development of a child. This can influence how a child feels about the government, its views on war, or what the child grows up to value. The chronosystem is liveness events that can alter or spay how the child feels about certain things or situations. For example, any transition such as a death of a parent, a birth of another child, or a divorce can change the views of a child.Bronfenbrenners ecological theory of development has helped to shape my development because as I was a young child, my parents were affectionate and nurturing towards myself and my siblings, we were embossed in a positive, stable, and structured environment, and my parents support a good education and were involved with our teachers in school. The way my parents raised me has helped me to function a great mother to my son. I try to posit sure that the people in his microsystem that he deals with directly are positive in orderliness to help him develop and grow into a positive individual. I consider myself to be nurturing and accessary towards my son. We have a good relatio nship and I try to raise him a positive environment as well. I instill in him, the values that my parents instilled in me. Since my levels in the ecological system were positive as I was growing up, I feel that it has influenced me to become a comprehensive individual. It has helped me to have morals, values, and self-respect.The levels in my ecological system have influenced me to value education and to requisite to pursue an education on the receive level. Because I take my role as a mother seriously, I essential to offer my son the best tone possible. This means that I have to be a great provider for him, which includes having a stable job that pays well and work in a course that I enjoy. I have always enjoyed learning about child development and I currently work with children in the mental health field. Obtaining a masters degree will help me to be able to develop and grow personally and more professionally so that I can be a let out provider for my family as well as ge t a job in the field that I wish to pursue. My career goals include working with children and adolescents either in the school system, as a child psychologist or social worker, or in the juvenile justice field. In the future, I hope to continue working with children directly, as a part of their microsystem, in order to make a difference and be a positive influence to them, as individuals in my microsystem were to me.So, is it safe to say that people are a product of their environment? I think Dr. Urie Bronfenbrenner did a good job of showing that this can be true by developing the ecological systems theory. However, we still have to be alive(predicate) of the fact that although a childs environment is very influential to their development, they have the power to change, or transition, their thoughts and beliefs. We must hark back that a persons beliefs systems can also be affected by experiences and situations that they encounter throughout life. So, yes our environment is very in fluential to our development, but we do not have to be a product of our environment since we are able to make changes within ourselves to become who we want to be.ReferencesDarling, N. (2007). Ecological Systems Theory The Person in the bear on of the Circles. p. 204. Retrieved celestial latitude 20, 2012 from http//www.uamont.edu/facultyweb/brown/PSY4683/Darling(2007).pdf Fox, M. (2005). Urie Bronfenbrenner renowned authorization on child development. New York quantify News Service. Retrieved December 20, 2012 from http//www.utsandiego.com/uniontrib/20051002/news_mz1j2urie.html Oswalt, A. (2008). Urie Bronfenbrenner and Child Development. Retrieved December 21, 2012 from http//www.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=doc&id=7930&cn=28 Paquette, D. & Ryan, J. (2001). Bronfenbrenners Ecological Systems Theory. Retrieved December 20, 2012 from http//people.usd.edu/mremund/bronfa.pdf Santrock, J. (2007). Bronfenbrenners Ecological Systems Theory. Retrieved December 20, 2012from http //impactofspecialneeds.weebly.com/bronfenbrennerrsquos-ecological-systems-theory.html