Terrorism Essay -- essays research papers

Terrorism is the unlawful use of force against persons or station to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population or any segment thereof, in the furtherance of political or social objectives". This rendering includes three elements (1) Terrorist activities are illegal and involve the use of force. (2) The actions are intended to intimidate or coerce. (3) The actions are committed in support of political or social objectives.The main topic here is Terrorism and Foreign Policy. The two terms that are going to be discussed is how the war against terrorism is expanding and how the Statesn electric chair George W. Bush misnamed his National Security Strategy.In his State of the Union address, President Bush threatened to expand the war on terrorism to countries that are underdeveloped weapons of mass destruction and nations that are timid in the face of terror. The president singled out three nations, northeastern Korea, Iran, and Iraq as the axis of evil and that he great power take military action to pre-empt the threat from their weapons of mass destruction. Although such rhetoric may simply be sabre rattling to intimidate those nations, the possibility of an refinement of the war is a real and insidious possibility. But those three countries hardly constitute an organized whollyiance against the get together States, as did the much more dangerous collaboration among Japan, Germany, and Italy during World War II. In fact, Iran and Iraq hate each other. And despite North Koreas continued harbouring of a few members of the Japanese Red Army, North Korea has not actively sponsored terrorist attacks in many years. Although North Korea, Iran, and Iraq are developing (or have acquired) weapons of mass destruction, so are many other nations. According to the Pentagon, 12 countries have nuclear weapons programs, 13 nations have biological weapons, 16 countries have chemical weapons and 28 nations have ballistic missiles. Is the president prep ared to attack all of those nations? What if North Korea, Iran, or Iraq has already sent intelligence operatives or terrorists to the United States with weapons of mass destruction to lie in wait in case a strike is needed in retaliation for a U.S. attempt at regime change? Iran or Iraq might do the same to Israel. The fact is that the United States must live with an increasing number of nations that have acquired weapons of mass des... ...tegy promulgated by President Bush in September 2002 does just the opposite. It prescribes a ball-shaped security strategy based on the false belief that the best and only way to achieve U.S. security is by forcibly creating a fall in and safer world in Americas image. A better approach would be a less interventionist foreign policy.It is too late to stop al Qaeda from targeting America and Americans. The United States must do everything in its power to dismantle the al Qaeda terrorist network worldwide, but the United States must also avoid ne edlessly making new terrorist enemies or fuelling the flames of virulent anti-American hatred. In the 21st century, the less the United States meddles in the affairs of other countries, the less likely the campaigner that America and Americans will be targets for terrorism.In sum, an apparent widening of the current war designed to enhance U.S security could have the opposite effect.http//www.workersparty.org/expanding-war-against-terrorism.htmlhttp//www.asiasource.org/asip/bello.cfmhttp//www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/01/29/bush.speech.txt/index.htmlhttp//www.afa.org/ magazine publisher/oct1999/1099edit.asphttp//www.dsausa.org/news/director.html