The Constitution and Checks and BalancesThe United States Constitution divides the powers of government with respect to police forces into cardinal nominally equal lucks , and grants one part solely to each of the legislative , executive director and discriminatory pegleges . The legislative discriminate is responsible for making the laws , the executive severalize for enforcing them , and the judicial branch is to interpret them The primary reason for this arrangement was a answer to the failure of the previous , the Articles of Confederation , and to the previous oppression of the British government . The drafters of the were determined that power not be severe with an individual or a small group inwardly the Government , lest they inadvertently recreate the Monarchy , or an elitist oligarchy . The enjoyment of the triple branches to separate the powers of government was designed to create a formation of checks and balances between the three groups . There are several eatable within the Constitution that reflect these checks and balances . One example is the appendage of impeachment of the President for High Crimes or Misdemeanors (Madison , et al . 1789 ) The process begins in the legislative branch with the House of Representatives passing a meridian of impeachment (Madison , et al . 1789 The Trial is then conducted in the senate , the other part of the legislative branch , and presided over by the head of the judicial branch , the Chief Justice (Madison , et al . 1789 ) This enables the other cardinal branches to limit the actions of the Chief Executive . Another manner by which the legislative branch can check the Executive branch is by something called the power of the purse The constitution states that all appropriations (spending ) bills must(prenominal) originate in the House of Representatives (Madison , et al . 1789 ) In a similar vein , only Congress can take hold war upon another nation (Madison , et al . 1789On the other go through , the executive holds significant power over the other branches as well .
He has the power to veto any law passed by Congress (Madison , et al . 1789 ) and he is charged with appointing the members of the national court system (Madison , et al . 1789 ) As commander of the build up forces , he can them into emergency action and maintain them on that point for a limited time without the consent of congress (Madison , et al . 1789 ) This means that the Chief Executive can choose to use the military and other employment agencies as he wishes , but in to fund any venture , he needs praise from congress . Additionally , the executive branch has the responsibility to hold the laws of Congress (Madison , et al . 1789 ) In so doing , they can model control over the extent , scope , and range of the enforcement . If the executive disagrees with the intent of a given law , it can enforce the law in the narrowest manner possible (Madison , et al . 1789 ) in like manner , executive regulatory agencies are often responsible for move penalties for legal violations , and these too can reflect the extent to which the executive agrees with the spirit of...If you want to get a full essay, effect it on our website:
Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment