Business Ethics - Kantian Principles

The Johnson Controls CaseIn the Johnson Controls Case , the family absolutely re moulded in a port that was morally prudent with comply to the lives of the unborn tikeren . Without attempting to labour into an wrinkle regarding the viability of a fetus , suffice it to say that the companionship acted on the logically assumed presumption that the unborn pincer would be born and following that logic , the company perspicacious that its products are particularly harmful to unborn children , the company do the dyinging to protect the lives and well-being of those unborn children by bar pregnant women from working on the production line . This decision was made based on protecting the dignity of homosexual life , that of the unborn children , and was done so in a way that was universal - the lives and well-being of all unborn children should be protected , and thusly the company was behaving in a way that they would wish to see universalized The company to a fault behaved autonomously , acting on their own moral judgments and values and disregarding the possible legitimate repercussions By these standards , according to Kantian principles and the argument for respect for persons , the company s decision was made regarding the utmost moral authority - that of maintaining respect for human life and dignity and treating humans as an end , and not as a means to an end - and is on that pointfore morally justifiableA possible counterargument , and likely the very same argument the company faced in the ensuing lawsuits that followed the decision , is that to ban a pregnant woman from productive labor is racist and therefore morally wrong .

The after-effects of a woman obligate into unemployment as a result of her pregnancy may whence mean that she is not able to care for the unborn child both pre- and post-natally , due to a lack of sufficient income to cracking the same level of health care nutrition , and capable shelter and clothing (not to mention the many different kinds of detail items that infant children require that can be very dear(p) . Therefore , according to this thought , the company did not act in a way that was entirely morally responsible in regards to the lives of the unborn childrenAccording to Kantian principles , the situation of discrimination sketch here is not a valid argument . And magic spell it is legitimate that it may be morally wrong to classify against another human being - or treating that person as a means and not as an end - the great issue here is the protecting of human life , which in turn nullifies any argument of discriminatory practices because the very root word of the discrimination itself is the preservation of life . While it is certainly true that the women left unemployed may have suffered financially , what we also do not know is how they were compensated at the clock time of their lay-offs and to what extent the company offered them assistance . Even that aside , there are a number of different assistance programs on tap(predicate) for pregnant women without sufficient income to seek...If you want to get a all-encompassing essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper