The Rich Get Richer And The Poor Get Prison

4 . What does Reiman say we should do5 . What do you think we should do In his book , The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get prison Jeffrey Reiman argues that the twist justice body is in fact culp open , but that it has little to do with justice . He believes that the criminal justice system has been crafted , probably without intent , to maintain the military position quo and protect the rights of those in power . Drawing from the theory espoused by Martin Luther poof Jr . in his Letter from a Birmingham Jail , Reiman argues that the system cannot promote justice because the laws are unjust , the prosecution of them is unjust and the determination of guilt is unjust . In his letter , King visits on pot to rise up against unjust laws in the name of liberty and equality Reiman falls short of this call to revolution , but he does argue that major changes contain to be made to the law and to society as a whole if there is going to be a near effort to reduce the crime rates in the fall in StatesReiman begins his argument by explaining the inequities in the way the law is be . Property crimes and face-to-face crime have systematically been define as major offenses in the country while another(prenominal) crimes which can cause the same detrimental effects , or perhaps however greater ones , are considered administrative issues or accomplished law violations , not criminal . Because these violations are considered civil or at worst negligence , the burden of establishment is often greater and often falls to the common citizen kind of of investigative agencies . These crimes then largely go unpunished . let in for example a major corporate employer who is discriminating against an employee . in that location is a federal (and usually state as fountainhead ) agency to investigate the allegations , but the burden of proof lies squarely on the shoulders of the victim .

If the victim does not have provable proof that he was wronged by the corporation , the case give generally go nowhere . If he does have severalise , then an investigation by bureaucrats , not law enforcement entrust ensue and may take years . In assembly line , if a man is mugged on the street and reports the crime , he has no burden of proof , no standard of evidence that he must present . Reiman would argue that these cases have contrastive burdens of proof because of the disparity in the criminal justice systemThe rootage disparity comes in the creation of laws and defining what it is illegal . Reiman argues that the people in power , the affluent and their friends , make laws designed to cover them in power . It is why there is a differentiation between negligent homicide and first degree or even second degree murder . This is done to protect the laden . For example if a factory owner allows safety conditions to pretermit and an employee is killed because of it , he would likely be subjected to a civil typesetters case . A zealous prosecutor might be able to develop negligent homicide charges...If you want to get a to the full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper